There is going to be a lot of information condensed in these posts, so don't worry if you don't understand everything the first time. If you see anything mentioned here that you would like to know more about, or that you think is unclear, let me know in the comments; that will help me see what topics you want to hear about.
In Part 1 I covered the Big Bang; the beginning. In today's post I will discuss what has happened since then. This post is going to use scientific notation; a really useful way of writing long numbers. If you are familiar with how it works, you can jump ahead and ignore this section. If you are unfamiliar with it, this is how it works:
- Big numbers. A number like 'one billion' has a lot of zeros, if we write it all out we get 1,000,000,000. Scientist love saving time, so what we do is we count the zeros, see there are nine of them, and put $10^9$. This means we have a 'one' followed by 'nine zeros'.
- Small numbers. The principle is the same: 'one billionth' would be 0.000000001. Again, we count the zeros, but this time the zeros are before the one, so we say they are negative, and write $10^{-9}$. So we have a 'one' preceded by 'nine zeros', we add a decimal place after the first zero, and we're done!
There are two ways we can answer this question. The first involves theoretically calculating the age of the universe, using the Hubble constant (which is a measure of the rate of expansion of the universe) and the Big Bang model. Using the latest data from the Planck satellite, this model-based age is currently 13.82 billion years. This calculation assumes our models are correct. The other way of answering the question is to look at model-independent evidence. Ideally, if our model is correct, the evidence will give the same result as the theory. So what evidence can we use?
- Radioactive decay. The age of chemical elements can be estimated using radioactive decay to determine how old a given mixture of atoms is. We basically look at the composition of a rock, and use the known half-life of elements (the half-life is the time it takes for half of a sample to have decayed) to estimate the age of the rock. When applied to rocks on the surface of the Earth, the oldest rocks are about 3.8 billion years old. When applied to meteorites, the oldest are 4.56 billion years old, which tells us how old the Solar System is. Applying this method to the whole universe is problematic, as we would need to find big old rocks, but we can apply this method to specific elements, like Uranium, which is present in very old, metal poor (earliest) stars. By studying the amount of uranium and thorium (the element uranium decays into) in very old stars, we can put a constraint on the age of the universe. Specifically, physicist found an estimate of $14.5\pm 2.6$, which means it is somewhere between 12 and 17 billion years.
- Star Clusters. There are millions of stars close to us that we can study. This means we have been able to understand a lot of properties about stars, and make a nice plot known as the 'Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram' to illustrate what we know.
Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Credit: ESO - White dwarfs. Imagine a star as massive as the Sun, compressed in a space as small as the Earth. These are called white dwarfs, and they are formed when small stars collapse at the end of their lifetime. These stars no longer experience fusion, so they have no energy source. They still have some residue heat left, but with no energy source, they gradually cool down. This means that the oldest white dwarfs will be the coldest and thus the faintest. We know more or less what temperature the star was when it collapsed (this is known by looking at a lot of stars, and seeing what they do often). If we are able to measure the current temperature of white dwarfs - by measuring their brightness - we can calculate how long they have been burning. Our same stellar models also predict how long the first white dwarfs take to form in the universe. So by searching for faint (old) white dwarfs, and combining this with how old the universe needs to be for them to exist, we can calculate the age of the universe. With this method, the age of the universe is calculated to be $12.8\pm 1.1$ billion years.
8. What has happened to the universe since the Big Bang?
Quite
a lot, actually. The history of the universe is a beautiful topic,
but it is quite expansive (like the universe itself!). So much has
happened in the universe's history that I decided to dedicate a
whole post to it, which I should post in the next few days/weeks. So here
I'll just review the key points in the universe's timeline. The main
idea to take away is the universe used to be very small and very hot, it has gradually been growing and cooling down, so today it's
very cold and very big.
A brief history of time. Credit: ESA - C. Carreau |
The
earliest time we can conceive of is the Planck time: $10^{-43}$s
after the Big Bang. We believe that the four forces (electromagnetic,
strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and gravity) were united, but our
understanding of this time is very limited. A region about
$10^{-33}$cm across is homogeneous and isotropic (it looks the same
in every direction wherever you look from), the temperature is
T=$10^{32}$K, which is ridiculously hot.
Not
long after the Big Bang ($10^{-36}$s), gravity breaks away from
the other three forces, and the strong force decides to do the same,
but electromagnetism and weak nuclear force are still bound together,
like two inseparable friends. When the strong force breaks away, it
triggers a period of inflation: rapid accelerated expansion.
Everything in the universe shoots away from everything else,
extremely quickly. This period of inflation ends about $10^{-30}s$
after the Big Bang. The temperature is still very hot ($10^{27}$K),
but due to the quick expansion the homogeneous region is now about 1m
across.
Everything we see is made of these little things. |
Our
understanding of the universe is much clearer from here on. After
inflation, the universe is filled with a very hot quark-gluon plasma.
As a quick review of the standard model; fermions - quarks and
leptons - are particles that occupy space, they are what normal matter is made of. Bosons,
on the other hand, are what matter uses to interact. The strong force
uses gluons to interact, the electromagnetic force uses photons, and
so on. As
the universe gradually cools to T$ = 10^{18}$K, the electromagnetic
and the weak force finally separate, and the Higgs Mechanism appears.
This means that at about $10^{-10}$s after the Big Bang, the universe
is governed by the same forces as today.
A
millionth of a second after the Big Bang, the temperature is 'low'
enough (T$ = 10^{15}$K) for quarks to clump together to form
hadrons, known as mesons (two quarks), and baryons (three quarks).
For an as-of-yet unknown, but fortunate, reason, there is a small
difference between matter (quarks) and antimatter (antiquarks), with
100,000,001 quarks for every 100,000,000 antiquarks and 100,000,000
photons. When the temperature reaches about T$ = 10^{13}$K, quarks
and antiquarks annihilate in equal parts, leaving only the small
excess of quarks. The homogeneous region of the universe is now at
least $10^{18}$m across. Similarly, as the temperature continues to
decrease, leptons and antileptons also annihilate into photons,
meaning most of the universe is made up of photons (light).
A
few minutes after the Big Bang, when the temperature has cooled down
to a billion degrees, nucleosynthesis takes place. This means atomic
nuclei (atoms without the charged electrons) can be created via
nuclear fusion: protons and neutrons fuse together to form hydrogen,
helium, lithium, beryllium, and boron. The quantity of these elements
is fixed at this stage, so measuring the abundance of these elements
in distant galaxies is a great proof of the Big Bang theory.
CMB as seen by Planck. Credit: ESA and the Planck Collaboration |
After
a busy start, the universe decided to chill out for a bit. Although
considering its dramatic start, who can blame it? Not much happened
for the next three hundred thousand years or so. The universe got colder and
bigger. And then, 380,000 years after the Big Bang, one of the most
important events took place: the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is
released. When the temperature of the universe has cooled to a couple
thousand degrees, protons and electrons combine to form neutral
hydrogen. This means the photons are 'left out', and so they start to
move around freely, making the universe more transparent. This CMB is
everywhere in the universe, and the best part is we can
measure this. This is like a window through time: by studying the
CMB we can see what the universe looked like nearly fourteen billion
years ago. We have put amazing satellites (COBE, WMAP, PLANCK) in
orbit to measure the light left over from the Big Bang, to understand
where we come from. Isn't that just amazing?
The
rest of the history of the universe is less dramatic: 150 million
years after the Big Bang, the first stars start to form, with heavier
elements forming inside. The stars explode as supernovas, scattering
these elements throughout the universe. More stars form, they clump
together to form galaxies, and the galaxies clump together to form
clusters, which in turn clump together to form super clusters. It's
like things suddenly realised the universe was a big scary place, so
they decided to all stick together.
Where
do we come in to all this? Just over 9 billion years after the Big
Bang, so 4.6 billion years ago, the Sun formed. Not long after, the rocks orbiting the Sun formed planets. On
the third planet from the Sun, after a few billion years, lifeforms
evolved enough to be sat here, reading a blog about cosmology, and probably drinking coffee. Hello,
humans!
Only two questions today, but considering we just covered more than 13 billion years, I think we can call it a day. Remember to check out Part 3!
Thank-you for the warm welcome into the world of Periscope. Your Sunday broadcast is right at church time, so I try to catch it on replay.
ReplyDeleteOne public session night at the observatory a couple years ago, I had a young man in his early 30's, approach me with a question. We were looking at M31 and I had said something about the light traveling 2.9 million years to reach us.
He had his wife and kids in formation behind him, and I sensed a set-up. He asked how do I reconcile that 2.9 million years with the fact that more and more scientists are agreeing that the universe is only about 6,000 years old.
With his family watching to see me take the bait, I carefully breathed and said "Really"? I'd love to see the evidence. Would you please share it with me?"
I heard no more from him that night or since. I hope his kids were paying attention.
I'm glad we have more scientists on Periscope! In the future, when I have a bit more time, I will try to do broadcasts during the week as well, as I know Sunday is not good for everyone.
DeleteI'm always amused how people try to justify their notions by saying 'scientists believe this too'. I like your response; if he has evidence to back up his claim, he should present it. Hopefully his kids will pick up the idea that all claims need evidence!
It would be great if you could do a Periscope from the observatory, I'm sure people would love to see M31 and some of the planets.
An interesting lecture summarizing current knowledge about the Universe. Or maybe a new breeze and a new idea might come in handy. See at utam-en.blogspot.com
ReplyDelete